Cristin-resultat-ID: 1058002
Sist endret: 6. desember 2013, 03:08
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2013
Resultat
Vitenskapelig artikkel
2013

Beyond the insider–outsider divide in migration research

Bidragsytere:
  • Jørgen Carling
  • Marta Bivand Erdal og
  • Rojan Ezzati

Tidsskrift

Migration Studies
ISSN 2049-5838
e-ISSN 2049-5846
NVI-nivå 1

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig artikkel
Publiseringsår: 2013
Publisert online: 2013

Klassifisering

Vitenskapsdisipliner

Samfunnsgeografi • Sosiologi

Emneord

Forskningsmetode • Migrasjon • Etnisitet

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Beyond the insider–outsider divide in migration research

Sammendrag

This article engages critically with the insider–outsider divide in research with migrants and advocates a more nuanced and dynamic approach to positionality. In migration research, the insider–outsider divide typically assumes a specific form: an insider researcher is a member of the migrant group under study, whereas an outsider researcher is a member of the majority population in the country of settlement. This divide is a discursive reality that researchers must relate to, regardless of its analytical merits. Our analysis builds on the authors’ experiences in twelve different fieldwork situations, where research was often conducted from hybrid positions that did not fit the archetypal insider–outsider divide. First, we discuss the relational construction of insider–outsider divides in migration research, focusing on the interplay between researcher characteristics and particular social contexts. Second, we address the specific characteristics or markers through which researchers are interpreted and positioned. These markers differ in terms of their visibility to informants, and in the extent to which researchers can modify them or communicate them selectively. Third, we examine how these characteristics are actively managed in fieldwork settings. Fourth, we identify five types of ‘third positions’ in migration research, positions that deviate from the archetypal insider–outsider divide: explicit third party, honorary insider, insider by proxy, hybrid insider-outsider, and apparent insider. The article explores some of the advantages and challenges inherent in different positions and argues that strategic and reflexive management of positionality should be included in ethical considerations about the research process.

Bidragsytere

Aktiv cristin-person

Jørgen Carling

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved PRIO - Institutt for fredsforskning

Marta Bivand Erdal

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved PRIO - Institutt for fredsforskning

Rojan Tordhol Ezzati

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Rojan Ezzati
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved PRIO - Institutt for fredsforskning
1 - 3 av 3