Cristin-resultat-ID: 1361026
Sist endret: 4. januar 2018, 12:26
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2016
Resultat
Vitenskapelig artikkel
2016

The Norwegian versions of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 – Validation and reliability studies

Bidragsytere:
  • Hilde Eide
  • Lena Leren og
  • Øystein Sørebø

Tidsskrift

Disability and Rehabilitation
ISSN 0963-8288
e-ISSN 1464-5165
NVI-nivå 1

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig artikkel
Publiseringsår: 2016
Publisert online: 2016
Trykket: 2017
Volum: 39
Hefte: 14
Sider: 1441 - 1448

Importkilder

Scopus-ID: 2-s2.0-84976911530

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

The Norwegian versions of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 – Validation and reliability studies

Sammendrag

Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the translated Norwegian version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-20) and the shorter version CPAQ-8 based on the same data. Method: The sample consisted of 120 women with chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain (CWP). The respondents completed CPAQ-20 and visual analogue scales (pain, fatigue, sleep problems and depression), General Health Questionnaire-12, The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire and SF-8. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed on a one-factor baseline model, the previous validated CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 models, as well as an exploratory generated model based on the current sample. Results: The two-factor model of CPAQ-20 and a two-factor model of CPAQ-8 obtained adequate model fit and outperformed the baseline model. The exploratory factor, analysis-generated two-factor model obtained only a marginally better fit, supporting the two-dimensional model of CPAQ-20. CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 had Cronbach’s alphas between 0.75 (Pain Willingness subscales both versions) and 0.85. Both scales correlated significantly in the hypothesised direction with all the other scales. Conclusion: The Norwegian versions of CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 are reliable assessment tools with good construct validity for measurement of acceptance. Future studies should validate the scales in other Norwegian samples.

Bidragsytere

Aktiv cristin-person

Hilde Eide

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for sykepleie- og helsevitenskap ved Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge

Lena Leren

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for sykepleie- og helsevitenskap ved Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge
Aktiv cristin-person

Øystein Sørebø

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for økonomi, markedsføring og jus ved Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge
1 - 3 av 3