Cristin-resultat-ID: 1439237
Sist endret: 31. mai 2017, 09:07
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2016
Resultat
Vitenskapelig artikkel
2016

Ambiguous participation in older hospitalized patients: gaining influence through active and passive approaches - a qualitative study

Bidragsytere:
  • Ingrid Nyborg
  • Kari Kvigne
  • Lars Johan Danbolt og
  • Marit Kirkevold

Tidsskrift

BMC Nursing
ISSN 1472-6955
e-ISSN 1472-6955
NVI-nivå 1

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig artikkel
Publiseringsår: 2016
Publisert online: 2016
Volum: 15
Hefte: 50
Open Access

Importkilder

Scopus-ID: 2-s2.0-85008312215

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Ambiguous participation in older hospitalized patients: gaining influence through active and passive approaches - a qualitative study

Sammendrag

Background: Patient participation is required by law in Norway and in several western countries. Current participation ideology is based on individualism, which may conflict with the older generation’s commonly held values of solidarity and community. Hence, different values and ideologies may come in conflict when older patients receive treatment and rehabilitation in geriatric wards. Participation is a guiding principle in rehabilitation. Criteria for admission of older patients to geriatric wards are complex health problems, acute illness and/or acute physical and/or cognitive functional failure. The ideal is an active and engaged patient. The aim of the study was to describe the difficulties experienced by older patients on acute geriatric wards when involving themselves with their own treatment and care. Methods: In this qualitative study older patients were interviewed during hospitalization in geriatric wards and asked to tell about their experiences with participation. Data analysis was conducted using a phenomenological hermeneutic method. Results: The patients experienced difficulties in participating in decisions and care. They linked their difficulties to their own diminishing capabilities, and cited the ward’s busy schedule as a reason for abstaining from participation. However, despite their reservations, they did participate in decisions in different ways. Their participatory practices appeared ambiguous and they employed various strategies to put themselves in a position of influence. The most important of these involved their relatives. The patients delegated to family the tasks of seeking, receiving and giving information to the nurses and the staff, and, to some extent, for the dialogues with hospital staff about their needs and plan of care. The family appeared to accept the responsibility willingly. Conclusions: The patients addressed their difficulties by authorizing family members to act and participate on their behalf. This underlines the family’s important role in patient participation and the role that nurses and other staff must play in collaborating with the patient and their family to facilitate participation independently of the patients’ performances of participation.

Bidragsytere

Aktiv cristin-person

Ingrid Jonetta Nyborg

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Ingrid Nyborg
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for helse og samfunn ved Universitetet i Oslo
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Div Gjøvik/Lillehammer ved Sykehuset Innlandet HF

Kari Johanne Kvigne

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Kari Kvigne
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for helse- og sykepleievitenskap ved Høgskolen i Innlandet
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Fakultet for sykepleie og helsevitenskap ved Nord universitet

Lars Johan Danbolt

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Div Psykisk helsevern ved Sykehuset Innlandet HF
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved MF vitenskapelig høyskole for teologi, religion og samfunn

Marit Kirkevold

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Avdeling for folkehelsevitenskap ved Universitetet i Oslo
1 - 4 av 4