Cristin-resultat-ID: 234700
Sist endret: 29. november 2008 11:56
Resultat
Vitenskapelig foredrag
2006

Patients’ validation of a coding scheme for concerns and cues

Bidragsytere:
  • Hilde Eide
  • Tom Eide
  • Tonje Sibbern
  • Tone Rustøen
  • Audun Stubbhaug og
  • Arnstein Finset

Presentasjon

Navn på arrangementet: The International Conference of Communication in Health Care
Sted: Basel
Dato fra: 5. september 2006
Dato til: 8. september 2006

Arrangør:

Arrangørnavn: EACH, European Association for Communication in Health Care

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig foredrag
Publiseringsår: 2006

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Patients’ validation of a coding scheme for concerns and cues

Sammendrag

Patients’ validation of a coding scheme for concerns and cues H Eide1*, A Finset2, A Stubhaug, 3 T Rustøen1 1Oslo University College, N, 2University of Oslo, N, 3 Rikshospitalet University Hospital Hilde.Eide@su.hio.no When helping patients, it is important to correctly identify the patient’s concerns and worry so that they can be part of the dialogue and the patient being helped. There has been a diversity of methods used to identify and describe patients concerns and cues. The EACH workgroup for sequential analysis has developed a consensus based method for defining and classifying concerns and cues. The aim of this study was to validate the method together with the patients The first consultation of twenty patients with medical unexplained widespread pain with a nurse at a pain clinic was videotaped. The tapes were coded according to the concern/cue coding scheme. Then the tape was shown to the patients and stopped at each cue and concern. The patient was asked whether this was important for him/her. The patient was also instructed to comment and stop the video if there were other important places in the consultation that were not identified by the researcher. The results from these twenty interviews will be presented. Preliminary data from two consultations shows that there is a very high degree of identification of cues and concerns when this method is applied. The duration of the consultations were about 30 minutes. One patient evaluated 22 cues and 12 concerns (explicit expression of negative emotion). All cues and concerns were relevant to the patient. This patient had no addition of extra concerns or cues. The second patient evaluated 16 cues and two concerns. One of the cues was not important for the patient, whereas the other were evaluated as appropriately identified. Based on the preliminary data, the coding scheme of concerns and cues seems to function well in identifying topics and themes that are of importance to the patient to have discussed in the consultation. Further strengths and limitations of the methods will be discussed. Keywords: Cues and concerns,

Bidragsytere

Aktiv cristin-person

Hilde Eide

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for sykepleie og helsefremmende arbeid ved OsloMet - storbyuniversitetet

Tom Eide

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved VID vitenskapelige høgskole
Aktiv cristin-person

Tonje Sibbern

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter

Tone Rustøen

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for sykepleie og helsefremmende arbeid ved OsloMet - storbyuniversitetet

Audun Stubbhaug

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Oslo universitetssykehus HF
1 - 5 av 6 | Neste | Siste »