Cristin-resultat-ID: 516219
Sist endret: 18. januar 2012 15:42
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2011
Resultat
Vitenskapelig oversiktsartikkel/review
2011

Psychosocial interventions as part of breast cancer rehabilitation programs? Results from a systematic review

Bidragsytere:
  • Egil Andreas Fors
  • Gro Falkener Bertheussen
  • Inger Thune
  • Lene Kristine Juvet
  • Ida-Kristin Ørjasæter Elvsaas
  • Line Merethe Oldervoll
  • mfl.

Tidsskrift

Psycho-Oncology
ISSN 1057-9249
e-ISSN 1099-1611
NVI-nivå 1

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig oversiktsartikkel/review
Publiseringsår: 2011
Volum: 20
Hefte: 9
Sider: 909 - 918

Importkilder

Isi-ID: 000295122700001

Klassifisering

Vitenskapsdisipliner

Fysikalsk medisin og rehabilitering

HRCS

  • Helsekategori: 2 - Kreft
    Aktivitet: 6.6 - Psykologiske og atferdsmessige

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Psychosocial interventions as part of breast cancer rehabilitation programs? Results from a systematic review

Sammendrag

Objective: This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of psychoeducation, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and social support interventions used in the rehabilitation of breast cancer (BC) patients.Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search to identify randomised controlled trials of female BC patients who underwent different psychosocial interventions during or after primary cancer treatment. The methodological quality of all studies was independently assessed by two reviewers. Studies with low quality, less than 20 participants in each group, patients with metastatic cancer, data not presented separately for BC and studies that included other cancer types were excluded.Results: Among 9617 identified studies, only 18 RCTs published between 1999 and 2008, including 3272 patients were finally included in this systematic evaluation. Outcome measures were categorised into quality of life (QoL), fatigue, mood, health behaviour and social function. Six trials examined psychoeducation had inconsistent results, both during and after the primary treatment. Seven trials examined the effect of CBT, four of which given after primary treatment (range 6-12 weeks) demonstrated improvements in QoL; the other three CBT studies given during primary treatment (range 9-20 weeks) had inconsistencies. Five studies addressed social support and showed no conclusive impacts of this intervention.Conclusions: Limited documentation exists on the efficacy of psychosocial rehabilitation interventions among BC patients. However, we found that patients might have QoL benefits from CBT given after primary BC treatment. More documentation is needed regarding the effects of CBT during primary treatment and the effects of psychoeducation and social support. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Bidragsytere

Egil Andreas Fors

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved PH - Østmarka psykiatriske avdeling ved St. Olavs Hospital HF
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie ved Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved St. Olavs Hospital HF

Gro Falkener Bertheussen

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk ved Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Klinikk for fysikalsk medisin og rehabilitering ved St. Olavs Hospital HF

Inger Thune

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Avdeling for kreftbehandling ved Oslo universitetssykehus HF

Lene Kristine Juvet

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Avdeling for vurdering av tiltak ved Folkehelseinstituttet

Ida Kristin Ørjasæter Elvsaas

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Ida-Kristin Ørjasæter Elvsaas
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Avdeling for vurdering av tiltak ved Folkehelseinstituttet
1 - 5 av 10 | Neste | Siste »