Cristin-resultat-ID: 518051
Sist endret: 23. august 2011 10:03
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2010
Vitenskapelig oversiktsartikkel/review

Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews

  • Anne G. Ekeland
  • Alison Bowes og
  • Signe Flottorp


International Journal of Medical Informatics
ISSN 1386-5056
e-ISSN 1872-8243
NVI-nivå 2

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig oversiktsartikkel/review
Publiseringsår: 2010
Volum: 79
Hefte: 11
Sider: 736 - 771


Scopus-ID: 2-s2.0-78049299029
Isi-ID: 000283647700002

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse


Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews


Abstract Objectives To conduct a review of reviews on the impacts and costs of telemedicine services. Methods A review of systematic reviews of telemedicine interventions was conducted. Interventions included all e-health interventions, information and communication technologies for communication in health care, Internet based interventions for diagnosis and treatments, and social care if important part of health care and in collaboration with health care for patients with chronic conditions were considered relevant. Each potentially relevant systematic review was assessed in full text by one member of an external expert team, using a revised check list from EPOC (Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group) to assess quality. Qualitative analysis of the included reviews was informed by principles of realist review. Results In total 1593 titles/abstracts were identified. Following quality assessment, the review included 80 heterogeneous systematic reviews. Twenty-one reviews concluded that telemedicine is effective, 18 found that evidence is promising but incomplete and others that evidence is limited and inconsistent. Emerging themes are the particularly problematic nature of economic analyses of telemedicine, the benefits of telemedicine for patients, and telemedicine as complex and ongoing collaborative achievements in unpredictable processes. Conclusions The emergence of new topic areas in this dynamic field is notable and reviewers are starting to explore new questions beyond those of clinical and cost-effectiveness. Reviewers point to a continuing need for larger studies of telemedicine as controlled interventions, and more focus on patients’ perspectives, economic analyses and on telemedicine innovations as complex processes and ongoing collaborative achievements. Formative assessments are emerging as an area of interest.


Anne G Ekeland

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Anne G. Ekeland
  • Tilknyttet:
    ved Nasjonalt senter for e-helseforskning ved Universitetssykehuset Nord-Norge HF

Alison Bowes

  • Tilknyttet:
    ved University of Stirling

Signe Agnes Flottorp

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Signe Flottorp
  • Tilknyttet:
    ved Institutt for samfunnsmedisinske fag ved Universitetet i Bergen
  • Tilknyttet:
    ved Avdeling for vurdering av tiltak ved Folkehelseinstituttet
1 - 3 av 3