Cristin-resultat-ID: 804187
Sist endret: 10. mars 2018 23:10
Resultat
Rapport
2009

Formaliserte konsensusprosesser, veiledning ved vanskelige valg?

Bidragsytere:
  • Ingrid Sperre Saunes
  • Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås
  • Marit Kristoffersen
  • Merete Lyngstad og
  • Bjørnar Nyen

Utgiver/serie

Utgiver

Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten

Om resultatet

Rapport
Publiseringsår: 2009
Antall sider: 42
ISBN: 978-82-8121-281-7

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Formaliserte konsensusprosesser, veiledning ved vanskelige valg?

Tittel

Formalized consensus processes

Sammendrag

1-page key messages Indicators are one of many sources to knowledge about patient safety. Which indicators we choose to use, determine the picture we are painting. How these choices are made and documented, are important sources of information when the results of the indicators shall be interpreted and comprehended. Many nations and international organizations use one or another form for formalized consensus processes in the development and choice of quality indicators for the health services. In this report we examine the principle behind the formalized consensus processes and describes one American method and two European tools which have been used for this purpose. In Norway, there are little or no tradition for conducting formalized consensus processes when choosing indicators within the health services. By building on the knowledge from other land and organizations within this field, we can implant this method by relative simple means. Developing medical quality registries and national indicators can profit from implementing formal consensus processes. There will be an extra cost by introducing this technique, but in the long term, the knowledge base will be sounder and less time used on developing and validating the indicators. Documentation of consensus processes provide extensive information about each single indicator and how it is considered within the medical environment. Strength and weaknesses for the indicators are documented, and are important background information for interpreting the results when the indicators are used. High cost for data collection may lead to exclusion of indicators, this is important knowledge to get the whole picture of information about sets of indicators. Transparency about indicator selection and the consequences of them are important factors in improving the understanding and use of quality indicators for the health services.

Bidragsytere

Aktiv cristin-person

Ingrid Sperre Saunes

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Helsetjenester ved Folkehelseinstituttet
Aktiv cristin-person

Ellen C Tveter Deilkås

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Den norske legeforening
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Helse Øst Kompetansesenter for Helsetjenesteforskning

Marit Kristoffersen

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Vestre Viken HF

Merete Lyngstad

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Norsk Sykepleierforbund

Bjørnar Nyen

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Folkehelseinstituttet
1 - 5 av 5