Cristin-resultat-ID: 1263939
Sist endret: 21. september 2017, 12:46
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2015
Resultat
Vitenskapelig artikkel
2015

Once bitten, twice shy: Aquaculture, stakeholder adaptive capacity, and policy implications of iterative stakeholder workshops; the case of Frøya, Norway

Bidragsytere:
  • Rachel Gjelsvik Tiller og
  • Russell Richards

Tidsskrift

Ocean and Coastal Management
ISSN 0964-5691
e-ISSN 1873-524X
NVI-nivå 1

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig artikkel
Publiseringsår: 2015
Volum: 118
Hefte: B
Sider: 98 - 109

Importkilder

Scopus-ID: 2-s2.0-84941701960

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Once bitten, twice shy: Aquaculture, stakeholder adaptive capacity, and policy implications of iterative stakeholder workshops; the case of Frøya, Norway

Sammendrag

Stakeholder inclusion in coastal zone management is part of the Norwegian fabric of inclusive government, and essential for the legitimacy of the distribution of coastal areas for a variety of uses. Norway is currently dependent upon the commitment and motivations of the municipalities to fulfil its ICZM initiatives. These municipalities in turn are dependent upon the goodwill of their constituents, among which are the fishers, for the distribution of area rights, especially when distributing to the aquaculture industry. In Frøya, these fishers have seldom made complaints against possible aquaculture localities, and have usually supported the governing institutions when coastal allocations are made in favour of aquaculture. With the possibility of a forthcoming supersized offshore salmon aquaculture facility in an important crabbing area, however, these stakeholders have come to the end of their goodwill. The following paper explores the use of iterative stakeholder workshops as a management tool. Ensuring that stakeholders are included in the management process can provide legitimacy thereof and minimize conflict. Insisting on iterative stakeholder workshops or consultations in processes that span longer time periods demonstrates that managers also take into account that constituent opinions are dynamic, and not static, and need to be accounted for, which could further legitimize their later decisions.

Bidragsytere

Rachel Gjelsvik Tiller

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Klima og miljø ved SINTEF Ocean
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap ved Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet

Russell Richards

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved The University of Queensland
1 - 2 av 2