Cristin-resultat-ID: 1675756
Sist endret: 11. februar 2019, 12:15
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2019
Resultat
Vitenskapelig artikkel
2019

Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis

Bidragsytere:
  • Stefania Osk Gardarsdottir
  • Edoardo de Lena
  • Matteo Romano
  • Simon Roussanaly
  • Mari Voldsund
  • José-Francisco Pérez-Calvo
  • mfl.

Tidsskrift

Energies
ISSN 1996-1073
e-ISSN 1996-1073
NVI-nivå 1

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig artikkel
Publiseringsår: 2019
Publisert online: 2019
Volum: 12
Hefte: 3
Open Access

Importkilder

Scopus-ID: 2-s2.0-85061538901

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis

Sammendrag

This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO2 avoided is between 42 €/tCO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/tCO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/tCO2. Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations

Bidragsytere

Stefania Osk Gardarsdottir

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Gassteknologi ved SINTEF Energi AS

Edoardo de Lena

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Politecnico di Milano

Matteo Romano

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Politecnico di Milano

Simon Nathanael Roussanaly

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Simon Roussanaly
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Gassteknologi ved SINTEF Energi AS

Mari Voldsund

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Gassteknologi ved SINTEF Energi AS
1 - 5 av 13 | Neste | Siste »