Sammendrag
In order to understand how organisms cope with ongoing changes in environmental variability it is important to consider all types of adaptations to environmental uncertainty on different time-scales. Conservative bet-hedging represents a long-term genotype-level strategy that maximizes lineage geometric mean fitness in stochastic environments by decreasing individual fitness variance, despite also lowering arithmetic mean fitness. Meanwhile, variance-prone (aka risk-prone) strategies produce greater variance in short-term payoffs because this increases expected arithmetic mean fitness if the relationship between payoffs and fitness is accelerating. Using two evolutionary simulation models, we investigate whether selection for such variance-prone strategies are counteracted by selection for bet-hedging that works to adaptively reduce fitness variance. We predict that variance-prone strategies will be favored in scenarios with more decision events per lifetime and when fitness accumulates additively rather than multiplicatively. In our model variance-proneness evolved in fine-grained environments (with lower correlations among individuals in energetic state and/or in payoffs when choosing the variable decision), and with larger numbers of independent decision events over which resources accumulate prior to selection. In contrast, geometric fitness accumulation caused by coarser environmental grain and fewer decision events prior to selection favors conservative bet-hedging via greater variance-aversion. We discuss examples of variance-sensitive strategies in optimal foraging, migration, life histories and cooperative breeding in light of these results concerning bet-hedging. By linking disparate fields of research studying adaptations to variable environments we should be more able to understand the effects in nature of human-induced rapid environmental change.
Vis fullstendig beskrivelse
