Cristin-resultat-ID: 1833275
Sist endret: 1. februar 2021, 10:29
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2020
Resultat
Vitenskapelig artikkel
2020

Effect of mechanical properties of monofilament twines on the catch efficiency of biodegradable gillnets

Bidragsytere:
  • Eduardo Grimaldo
  • Bent Herrmann
  • Nadine Jacques
  • Jørgen Vollstad og
  • Biao Su

Tidsskrift

PLOS ONE
ISSN 1932-6203
e-ISSN 1932-6203
NVI-nivå 1

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig artikkel
Publiseringsår: 2020
Publisert online: 2020
Volum: 15
Hefte: 9
Artikkelnummer: e0234224
Open Access

Importkilder

Scopus-ID: 2-s2.0-85091619549

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Effect of mechanical properties of monofilament twines on the catch efficiency of biodegradable gillnets

Sammendrag

Gillnets made of the biodegradable resin polybutylene succinate co-adipate-co-terephthalate were tested under commercial fishing conditions to compare their fishing performance with that of conventional nylon polyamide (PA) gillnets. Both types of gillnets were made of 0.55 mm Ø monofilaments. However, since the biodegradable nets are weaker than nylon PA nets when using the same monofilament diameter, we also used biodegradable nets made of 0.60 mm Ø monofilament that had a similar tensile strength to the 0.55 mm Ø nylon PA nets. The relative catch efficiency of the different gillnet types was evaluated over the 2018 autumn fishing season for saithe and cod in northern Norway. For cod, both biodegradable gillnets (0.55 and 0.60 mm) had a significantly lower catch efficiency compared to the traditional nylon PA net (0.55 mm) with estimated catch efficiencies of 62.38% (CI: 50.55–74.04) and 54.96% (CI: 35.42–73.52) compared with the nylon PA net, respectively. Similarly for saithe, both biodegradable gillnets (0.55 and 0.60 mm) had a lower estimated catch efficiency compared to the traditional nylon PA net (0.55 mm) with estimated catch efficiencies of 83.40% (71.34–94.86) and 83.87% (66.36–104.92), compared with the nylon PA net, respectively. Tensile strength does not explain the differences in catch efficiency between the two gillnet types, since increasing the twine diameter of the biodegradable gillnets (to match the strength of nylon PA gillnets) did not yield similar catch efficiencies. However, the elasticity and stiffness of the materials may be responsible for the differences in catch efficiency between the nylon PA and biodegradable gillnets.

Bidragsytere

Eduardo Enrique Grimaldo Vela

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Eduardo Grimaldo
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Fiskeri og ny biomarin industri ved SINTEF Ocean

Bent Herrmann

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Fiskeri og ny biomarin industri ved SINTEF Ocean
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Norges fiskerihøgskole ved UiT Norges arktiske universitet

Nadine Louise Jacques

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Nadine Jacques
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Norges fiskerihøgskole ved UiT Norges arktiske universitet

Jørgen Vollstad

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Fiskeri og ny biomarin industri ved SINTEF Ocean

Biao Su

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Havbruk ved SINTEF Ocean
1 - 5 av 5