Cristin-resultat-ID: 2032500
Sist endret: 26. januar 2023, 14:57
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2022
Resultat
Vitenskapelig artikkel
2022

Comparison of cancer incidence and mortality in the Norwegian Fire Departments Cohort, 1960-2018

Bidragsytere:
  • Niki Marjerrison
  • Jarle Jacobsen
  • Paul A. Demers
  • Tom Kristian Grimsrud
  • Johnni Hansen
  • Jan Ivar Martinsen
  • mfl.

Tidsskrift

Occupational and Environmental Medicine
ISSN 1351-0711
e-ISSN 1470-7926
NVI-nivå 2

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig artikkel
Publiseringsår: 2022
Volum: 79
Sider: 736 - 743
Open Access

Importkilder

Scopus-ID: 2-s2.0-85130802754

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Comparison of cancer incidence and mortality in the Norwegian Fire Departments Cohort, 1960-2018

Sammendrag

Objectives Elevated risk of cancer at several sites has been reported among firefighters, although with mixed findings. The purpose of this study was to calculate standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) for cancer and compare them to assess whether use of the different measures could be a source of inconsistencies in findings. Methods The Norwegian Fire Departments Cohort, comprising 4295 male employees who worked at 15 fire departments across Norway, was linked to health outcome registries for the period 1960–2018. SIRs and SMRs were derived using national reference rates. Results Overall, we observed elevated incidence of colon cancer (SIR, 95% CI 1.27, 1.01 to 1.58), mesothelioma (2.59, 1.12 to 5.11), prostate cancer (1.18, 1.03 to 1.34) and all sites combined (1.15, 1.08 to 1.23). Smaller, non-significant elevations were found for mortality of colon cancer (SMR, 95% CI 1.20, 0.84 to 1.67) and mesothelioma (1.66, 0.34 to 4.86), while SMR for prostate cancer was at unity. Potential errors were observed in some of the mortality data, notably for mesothelioma cases. Among those who died of cancer, 3.7% (n=14) did not have a prior diagnosis of malignancy at the same site group. Conclusions Assessment of incidence or mortality did not greatly influence the interpretation of results. The most prominent differences in SIR and SMR appeared to be due to inconsistencies between sites of cancer diagnosis and cause of death. The difference in SIR and SMR for prostate cancer suggested a detection bias from differential screening practices.

Bidragsytere

Niki Marjerrison

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Kreftregisteret - Institutt for populasjonsbasert kreftforskning
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Avdeling for biostatistikk ved Universitetet i Oslo

Jarle Jacobsen

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Kreftregisteret - Institutt for populasjonsbasert kreftforskning
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Avdeling for biostatistikk ved Universitetet i Oslo

Paul A. Demers

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Cancer Care Ontario

Tom Kristian Grimsrud

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Kreftregisteret - Institutt for populasjonsbasert kreftforskning

Johnni Hansen

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Kræftens Bekæmpelse
1 - 5 av 9 | Neste | Siste »