Cristin-resultat-ID: 2065008
Sist endret: 10. februar 2023, 15:01
NVI-rapporteringsår: 2022
Resultat
Vitenskapelig artikkel
2022

With great power comes great responsibility: why ‘safe enough’ is not good enough in debates on new gene technologies

Bidragsytere:
  • Sigfrid Kjeldaas
  • Tim Dassler
  • Trine Antonsen
  • Odd Gunnar Wikmark og
  • Anne Ingeborg Myhr

Tidsskrift

Agriculture and Human Values
ISSN 0889-048X
e-ISSN 1572-8366
NVI-nivå 1

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig artikkel
Publiseringsår: 2022
Publisert online: 2022
Open Access

Importkilder

Scopus-ID: 2-s2.0-85141094507

Klassifisering

Vitenskapsdisipliner

Teknologi

Emneord

Genredigering • Genetiske og biologiske langtidsserier i en naturlig populasjon • Funksjonell genomikk • GMO

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

With great power comes great responsibility: why ‘safe enough’ is not good enough in debates on new gene technologies

Sammendrag

New genomic techniques (NGTs) are powerful technologies with the potential to change how we relate to our food, food producers, and natural environment. Their use may affect the practices and values our societies are built on. Like many countries, the EU is currently revisiting its GMO legislation to accommodate the emergence of NGTs. We argue that assessing such technologies according to whether they are ‘safe enough’ will not create the public trust necessary for societal acceptance. To avoid past mistakes of under- or miscommunication about possible impacts, we need open, transparent, and inclusive societal debate on the nature of the science of gene (editing) technologies, on how to use them, and whether they contribute to sustainable solutions to societal and environmental challenges. To be trustworthy, GMO regulation must demonstrate the authorities’ ability to manage the scientific, socio-economic, environmental, and ethical complexities and uncertainties associated with NGTs. Regulators and authorities should give equal attention to the reflexive and the emotional aspects of trust and make room for honest public and stakeholder inclusion processes. The European Group of Ethics in Science and Technology’s recent report on the Ethics of Genome Editing (2021) is important in calling attention to a series of fundamental issues that ought to be included in debates on the regulation and use of NGTs to ensure public trust in these technologies and in regulating authorities. With the great power of NGTs comes great responsibility, and the way forward must be grounded in responsible research, innovation, and regulation.

Bidragsytere

Sigfrid Kjeldaas

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for språk og kultur ved UiT Norges arktiske universitet

Tim Dassler

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Human Factor in High Risk Environments ved UiT Norges arktiske universitet
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved NORCE Klima og miljø ved NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
Aktiv cristin-person

Trine Antonsen

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for språk og kultur ved UiT Norges arktiske universitet
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved NORCE Klima og miljø ved NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS

Odd Gunnar Wikmark

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved NORCE Klima og miljø ved NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for språk og kultur ved UiT Norges arktiske universitet

Anne Ingeborg Myhr

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved NORCE Klima og miljø ved NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for språk og kultur ved UiT Norges arktiske universitet
1 - 5 av 5