Cristin-resultat-ID: 2081736
Sist endret: 27. november 2022, 11:13
Resultat
Vitenskapelig foredrag
2022

Energy grids of the future – Connecting the dots

Bidragsytere:
  • Stian Backe
  • Felipe Van de Sande Araujo
  • Gerd Hovin Kjølle
  • Hanne Sæle og
  • Iver Bakken Sperstad

Presentasjon

Navn på arrangementet: Workshop on Energy grids of the future – Connecting the dots
Sted: Digital
Dato fra: 10. mai 2022
Dato til: 10. mai 2022

Arrangør:

Arrangørnavn: NTRANS

Om resultatet

Vitenskapelig foredrag
Publiseringsår: 2022

Klassifisering

Vitenskapsdisipliner

Samfunnsøkonomi • Teknologi • Naturressursforvaltning

Beskrivelse Beskrivelse

Tittel

Energy grids of the future – Connecting the dots

Sammendrag

The workshop brought together stakeholders across the energy sector for interdisciplinary discussions on the future power grid. The goal was to identify key drivers and barriers for power grid development to enable a low-carbon society, which are listed respectively in Table 1 and Table 2. The drivers and barriers were identified through the presentation of scientific research and discussion among participants in the electricity sector. The future grid is determined both by the status quo and the trends that are currently shaping society and policies. Climate change is currently one of the most wide-spanning threats, and a major driver for the development of the future grid is in the form of climate change mitigation efforts, where electrification is a major mitigation measure. Several regulatory changes are being made in the power system to reduce carbon emissions, with ripple effects in other sectors of society. Mapping drivers and barriers for future grid development are useful when discussing what to expect of the future power system and how to arrive there. The electric grid is regulated as a natural monopoly and regulation is not easy to design or adapt in a changing power system. Regulation can both facilitate and hinder grid development, and it is, therefore, a key element to enable the future grid. The regulation defines the role of the different participants in the electricity sector, but the role of aggregators1 are not clearly defined. There is also a discussion about how current revenue cap regulation for the distribution grid companies incentivizes investment in grid infrastructure versus the development of new flexibility solutions. Cultural barriers are also relevant. Grid companies are focused on system security and reliability, and their company culture is to develop robust infrastructure. New solutions can be perceived as vulnerable and less reliable than established ones, which could be a barrier to utilising external flexible assets. At the same time, customer culture is equally critical to offer flexibility potential in a local flexibility market, especially if customers have trust issues regarding the external control by grid companies or aggregators on private electricity use. Flexibility market design faces barriers such as the uncertainty regarding the agent responsible for its implementation and maintenance. Distribution grid companies don’t have the expertise to participate in such markets, or even lack the tools to forecast flexibility needs. Other agents may be able to develop and use better tools and knowledge, but there is a lack of common communication protocols, which could facilitate the coordination of actions. Barriers and drivers for grid development can be organized into layers, from global trends to categories that are external and internal to the grid. Among the megatrends, besides climate change, geopolitics and security of electricity supply are important factors that influence the grid development, as is digitalization which provides new opportunities to monitor and organize supply and demand in the grid. Important external drivers of grid development are political goals and societal trends, technology, and current and future business models. Political goals and societal trends reflect decisions that are taken by all, and thus society engagement and participation are highly relevant. Knowledge of the problem is equally important as finding the best outcome, and information should be available for customers to understand their role in the grid. Grid companies can also act as facilitators for the adoption of better measures for grid development.

Bidragsytere

Aktiv cristin-person

Stian Backe

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Energisystemer ved SINTEF Energi AS
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for industriell økonomi og teknologiledelse ved Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet

Felipe van de Sande Araujo

Bidragsyterens navn vises på dette resultatet som Felipe Van de Sande Araujo
  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Institutt for industriell økonomi og teknologiledelse ved Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet

Gerd Hovin Kjølle

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Energisystemer ved SINTEF Energi AS

Hanne Sæle

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Energisystemer ved SINTEF Energi AS

Iver Bakken Sperstad

  • Tilknyttet:
    Forfatter
    ved Energisystemer ved SINTEF Energi AS
1 - 5 av 5